Hey, > This is on M120 running 12.3R6-S3 (yes I know, ancient. No, can't upgrade).
Then I recommend 'set system no-bugs'. > CUST-VRF-FOO.inet.0: 2594 destinations, 3572 routes (2594 active, 0 > holddown, 0 hidden) > Limit/Threshold: 2000/1600 destinations > BGP: 3572 routes, 2594 active > > > Mar 28 09:03:45 router rpd[1598]: RPD_RT_PREFIX_LIMIT_REACHED: Number > of prefixes (2593) in table CUST-VRF-FOO.inet.0 still exceeds or > equals configured maximum (2000) > Anyone aware of a PR on this? Is this a known limitation? There are some PRs related to ways routes appear on RIB and that not all of these ways honour maximum-prefixes. One I found is PR1157842, but it's not really exact match to yours, provided your config is realistic and not cherry-picked example of what you believe is relevant to the problem. Could you try 'maximum-paths' instead? Just as additional datapoint. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
