> From: Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 3:43 PM > To: Robert Raszuk > Cc: [email protected]; Saku Ytti; Juniper List > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN/RR/PE on Same router > > Hi, > > > > Le 17 août 2018 à 16:28, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> a écrit : > > >> and that thing would then crash BGP on RRs, can't afford that happening. > > > > Then best thing is to run two or three RRs in parallel each using > > different BGP code base - even for the same AFI/SAFI pair > > > > I am seeing number of networks running single vendor RRs and when > > things melt they run around and claim that the problem was was really > > so rear and unexpected :) Well usually bugs are of unexpected nature .... > > And I have seen the opposite, ie networks running multiple vendor RRs, > ending up with crashs because of buggy BGP implementations. > > At the end of the day, it is a question of tossing a coin and hopping it will > fall > on the right side. > It's about increasing the odds of it to fall on the right side,
Yes you can have multiple vendors that have the same quagga/bird BGP message parser code, But comparing say XR and Junos, judging from the rest of the inner workings I could experience empirically, I'd say they are sufficiently different implementations. adam netconsultings.com ::carrier-class solutions for the telecommunications industry:: _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
