Louis, for reason (I assume some issue) is TAC saying that a host-upgrade solves something? I also assume from Junos SW point of view, you plan to stay with 14.1X53-D43, yes?
BTW, in the future solution to this is to perform Host Upgrade at same time as Junos Upgrade, using the force-host option - https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/task/installation/qfx-series-software-upgrading-cli.html Best of luck, Rich On 9/6/18, 2:23 PM, "Louis Kowolowski" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 6, 2018, at 1:11 PM, Nitzan Tzelniker <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you cant afford taking down the whole VC do not work with VC > This is my philosophy with VC > Do MC-LAG or EVPN in these environment (even with VC just to increase the number of ports ) > This is now my philosophy as well. Just working on cleaning up the mess w/as little impact as I can. > Regarding the host they dont have to be the same unless there is a known issue > > From https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/task/installation/qfx-series-software-upgrading.html > However, pay attention to these notes regarding Junos OS and Host OS versions: > • The Junos OS and Host OS versions do not need to be the same. > • During an ISSU, the Host OS cannot be upgraded. > • Upgrading the Host OS is not required for every software upgrade, as noted above. > Yes, and clarification from JTAC is that they need to be the same major version, which doesn't sound unreasonable. -- Louis Kowolowski [email protected] Cryptomonkeys: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cryptomonkeys.com_&d=DwIFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=cViNvWbwxCvdnmDGDIbWYLiUsu8nisqLYXmd-x445bc&m=SwXGavYoXMX7_3ONE2EFDbM6qqRplmC0qoQHLrDr_HI&s=TRlgGH-vOckvzTgRz3rVHAdHuIz4wUvhYEmam8MKFas&e= Making life more interesting for people since 1977 _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
