No problem! @Niall : I can't remember if there was something under the hood that made the discard *interface* more preferable than just a discard *route*. In our implementation we have a qualified next-hop to send flagged traffic to a local collector box first, and only discard if that's not reachable, and we're not doing anything on dsc.0 that a straight discard route couldn't do.
Otherwise yeah, running a count filter on dsc for metrics about what the traffic was was kinda the entire point I thought. :) On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:40 PM Jason Healy <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 12, 2018, at 9:07 AM, Niall Donaghy <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Yes we (large ISP) tried using dsc interfaces (MX series) to count RTBH > > traffic and found, 1) they don't count, and 2) IPv6 is unsupported for > dsc. > > That's what I needed to know! Back to standard discard routes it is... > > Thanks to you and Tom for saving me any more pain trying to figure this > out. > > Jason > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
