On 24/Jan/19 11:26, Saku Ytti wrote: > I don't disagree, I just disagree that there are common case where > bandwidth is most indicative of good SPT. Agreed. > I'd like to see mock-up topology, where bandwidth metric makes any > sense at all, and is more frequently right than role or latency. It doesn't. As with any thought-process that was used back in the day, the general belief was that the more bandwidth you have, the better life will always be. Real life, obviously, is very different. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
- [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T Event Script
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T Thomas Bellman
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T James Bensley
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth ... Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwi... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwi... James Bensley
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T adamv0025
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T Pavel Lunin
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T Thomas Bellman
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T James Bensley

