On 24/Jan/19 22:24, Luis Balbinot wrote:
> That’s a good idea. I’m not 100% sure that this will prevent the creation > of bypass LSPs but I’ll give it a try. In theory, that should work, as the node will, effectively, be taken out of the IS-IS path (and all ensuing support services). Would be interested to hear how this works out. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
