Franz- I have used successfully used hyper mode on MPC4E in M2K for a few years with little regrets. I chose to do this as I didn't have the equipment to do line rate testing and I do a significant amount of counters on untrusted ports. As others have suggested, you need to know feature limitations. We certainly do .1q as well as double tagging so the vlan padding feature is not what you think it is.
Re MX204, I read that line rate thread differently. I thought hypermode actually increased PPS on the ingress processing side but I 100% agree that hypermode does NOT affect the WO queue difference on the MX204. So in short I think there is some benefit in enabling hypermode on MX204 but not the full benefit of a native MPC7 if you have a especially complex ingress ACL policy? -Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of > Franz Georg Köhler > Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 3:40 AM > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [j-nsp] Hyper Mode on MX > > Hello, > > I wonder if it is gererally a good idea to enable HyperMode on MX or if > there are reasons not do do so? > > We are currently running MX960 with FPC7. > > > Best regards, > > Franz Georg Köhler > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
