Same. Juniper is running WAY too late on an ACX5048 replacement with 100G interfaces. We had great expectations for the ACX5448 until we saw the price list being 3-4x higher than the 5048.
Regarding the original question, I'd also check the MPC5 if your budget is restricted and you have slots to spare. You can get 12x10G and 3x40G if you only need to serve that one customer over 40G. Juniper's pricing for the MPC7-MRATE is also ridiculous at 2x the price of an MX204. On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 10:27 AM Aaron Gould <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: > > My ISP network is core/agg mpls rings of MX960's and ACX5048's....960's > connect 40 gig to 5048's using the MPC7E-MRATE in the MX960. > > Seems good to me so far.... > > Also use MX960 40 gig on MPC7E-MRATE to DC/CDN deployments of QFX5120's > (pure Ethernet tagging). > > -Aaron > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
