I was not impressed with the Palo Alto VPN solution when I looked into it a couple years ago.
I think it was designed to be an always-on VPN solution to protect corporate devices that are on the road, which is not our use case. They did not support all of the major platforms we needed at the time, however it looks like they have added a lot in recent versions. -- Eldon On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, 07:52 Aaron Gould <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: > OK so yesterday I heard from other Juniper sources that this is not really > recommended anymore... that Juniper acquired Pulse Secure years ago, but > later, got rid of the Pulse Secure company and no longer really recommends > this dynamic/remote access vpn solution... and furthermore, that Juniper is > actually coming out with a newer Remote Access VPN solution soon.... (I > heard 3Q2019). Does anyone know anything about this? > > Perhaps I should just look at better remote access vpn solutions. > > I'm replacing old HA Active/Standby ASA5520's, which have also been my > remote access appliance for getting into the network remotely. > > I've heard Palo Alto are good. > > -Aaron > > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
