Hi Aaron. This is definitely not possible. You can’t jump from the data plane out of the fxp port. This is why things like jflow are only possible inband
Regards Dave On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 17:01, Aaron Gould <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks again (Chris) for solving my vpls/irb/tagging combination problem > yesterday. we can bridge successfully now. > > > > Taking this one step further, we now are trying to route via fxp0 and > *through* it to the irb.100 interface and are unable to. > > > > Is it possible to route traffic *through* an fxp0 interface ? (MX204) > > > > I'm asking since it seems that someone mentioned that it is in fact > possible > with some sort of static routes. but I'm unsure what they meant exactly. > > > > If it's definitely not possible to transit an fxp0 interface, I just need > to > know that, and I will seek solutions using a revenue interface instead. > > > > Resurrecting an old thread(s).. > > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg09809.html > > https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2010-August/017545.html > > > > subnet A---------fxp0/mx204/irb.100------------subnet B > > > > <-------------------is bi-dir comms possible?--------------> > > > > > > -Aaron > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
