A note on that. Not only does the switch stop responding and needs to be power cycled, but in our case while this happens uplink ports on a redundant ring bridge BPDUs from working switches and you get a nice linerate traffic loop going.
We also use those as OOB management for our MX routers and other gear, and without any l2 protection MX starts slipping and drops BGP and other important protocols while this happens. As per TAC recommendation, we've downgraded to the latest 15.X version, been stable for about a week. -----Original Message----- From: juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of Nelson, Brian Sent: December 9, 2019 10:46 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX2300 Code If Juniper provides a version which is stable for more that a few weeks let me know. I've been chasing version upgrades for months now. Brian Nelson On 12/9/19 5:15 AM, William wrote: > Hi, > > I am in the process of getting our first stack of EX2300s ready for > production, can anyone recommend any specific versions of junos to run > on them? > > I'm not taking advantage of any advance features, just after something > stable :) > > Cheers, > > William > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > -- Supervisor Computing Systems Support Dept of Computer Science _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
