Replace absurd with unexpected, then. -- Eldon
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019, 02:15 Saku Ytti <[email protected]> wrote: > Many absurd things will become reasonable and logical when they are > sufficiently understood. > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 17:22, Eldon Koyle > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > My biggest complaint about the mx10003 is the absurd port restrictions. > If > > you use pic-level config, you can run all ports at 40G or 4x10G, but if > you > > want to use port-level speed config you have to set one of every 4 ports > to > > 100G on pic 1 in each slot to be able to use all of the ports. > > > > Be sure to check your desired config for compatibility: > > https://apps.juniper.net/home/port-checker/index.html > > > > -- > > Eldon > > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019, 01:05 Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 18/Dec/19 19:47, Jason Lixfeld wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I wanted to follow up on a thread from a couple of years ago about > the > > > MX10003 > > > > > > > > https://lists.gt.net/nsp/juniper/63670?search_string=mx10003 > > > > > > > > We’ve got a bunch of MX204s that we use for peering and transit over > LDP > > > based L3VPN pinned up with IS-IS and BFD. We’re quite happy with these > > > boxes from a cost, density and feature perspective. We’ve had no > issues > > > with them at all so far in the few months that they’ve been in the > field. > > > > > > > > Now, we’re looking for something to use in the same role, but with > > > higher 100G port density. The MX10003 seems like a good fit from a > cost > > > perspective verses something like an MX240, but also from a feature and > > > performance perspective because it uses the same hardware as the MX204 > in > > > terms of EA Trios and CPU on the MPC, along with the CPU and memory on > the > > > RE (except the MX204 has 32GB on the RE as opposed to 64GB on the > MX10003). > > > > > > > > Wondering how folks are feeling about these boxes a couple of years > > > later. > > > > > > We like the MX10003 as a 100Gbps edge router. It comes with the > > > additional port density and hardware redundancy that the MX204 doesn't > > > have, so it does have a role to play. > > > > > > For customers that want 100Gbps ports, we will dump them on the > MX10003. > > > > > > Mark. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > -- > ++ytti > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
