Mark and gents.
Juniper really doesn't care about Metro services, since ACX5048, "The
Promissed" equipment that was ready to solve our problems regarding port
density and functions, but... ACX5048 doesn't work as expected as Giuliano
said(Giuliano is my SE), We brought some ACX5048... in less than a month of
operation, we remove those box from network, they became a layer2 switch only.
So Juniper release the new ACX, but the problems still the same.
From my perspective, they don't have time to develop a good software
and they just release anything for us thinking that someday, they will correct
the software of the new hardwar, and we will be happy, but they just forget
that we provide services and we have SLA. I have my personal cents about this
subject...
MX, maybe, is the most stable hardware/software that they had in this
moment. But there is no good density of ports, or we had to choose what type of
ports we had to work on with, I can't accept this, a MPC7E-MRATE working with
only 4 100Gb ports... (aahhh this is because de backplane bla bla bla bla....)
hardware release with bad development to run against market... to not lose the
market.
Other problem that I have here, is with QFX5100 platform, using a
functionality(version 14.1X53-D35.3), that they remove at the newest release
software, and, they(Juniper) don't had solution for that and, they really don't
care....
Now I have a big problem in large scale, since I have hundreds of
QFX5100, can't upgrade due that, and JTAC don't support that old release
anymore.
And, I don't want to talk about QFX5120.... deception...
This is my cent, and my feelings about.
Att
Alexandre
Em 22/01/2020 12:41, "juniper-nsp em nome de Mark Tinka"
<[email protected] em nome de [email protected]> escreveu:
On 22/Jan/20 17:17, Eric Van Tol wrote:
>
> Which is something many of us smaller providers have been begging them
for YEARS to make. Hopefully it doesn't have restrictions on port
configurations like the MX204 or weird filtering limitations like the original
ACX boxes. The ASR920 is popular for a reason - they are rock-solid, offered
decent port configurations, sensible and reasonably priced licensing, small
form-factor and features decent enough for an access MPLS device.
And, custom silicon that does, pretty much, what you're used to seeing
on IOS XE boxes.
Juniper, I've realized, are really not interested in the Metro-E space.
I know it's great to think merchant silicon is the answer to get into
that space, but it doesn't look to me like they will be bother the
ASR920 anytime soon.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_juniper-2Dnsp&d=DwICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=d3qAF5t8mugacLDeGpoAguKDWyMVANad_HfrWBCDH1s&m=TU6hC3CmliVPupj04_YNYHTF5VVsspISdyOjUEnr2TM&s=r-fSdwLUay6e6rXEc7nibhLO1FNxOw1U62KPIFpFeF4&e=
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
