> On 22/02/2020, at 10:52 PM, Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 at 00:26, Jeff Haas <jh...@juniper.net> wrote: > >> The problem and example in the thread were past the ability of my brain to >> follow this round. >> That said, there's some amount of plumbing that can permit a route that's >> been imported into a VRF to locally resolve vs. the local VRF tables rather >> than share the fate of its primary route. >> This plumbing isn't generally exposed at this time. Magic words >> "independent resolution". Just in case that fits the ER. :-) > > Ooh, very good news. Nathan, can you please talk to your account team > about this and get formal ER going? I'm happy to 'me too' my account > team, once you have the ER number. And Jeff's work is made whole lot > easier when he can go 'customers are asking this’.
Sounds great - will see what I can get going tomorrow. -- Nathan Ward _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
