On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 20:09, Chuck Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > I disagree that they would be any good at it--it would likely be filled with > the same holes as we've seen here given network vendors' poor history in this > area (see bad filters taking out IS-IS, IPv6 ND, and NFS traffic on EX4500 > switches for example). As this thread points out, getting the filters right > is hard. If they were hardcoded by Juniper, that would just make them opaque > and unchangeable. We'd all benefit from much more transparency and sharing > of experiences.
Juniper has hidden group which is applied to your config, default lo0 filter could come from there, when not configured. And it could evolve via JTAC. It can consume information no external site can consume. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
