On 15/Jun/20 16:20, Richard McGovern via juniper-nsp wrote:
> Better approach to whole subject is to not fall so far behind on Code
> upgrades. I know, easier said then done. I'd say more than 2 or 3 behind
> current is a risk, and I am all for "if it's not broken, why change". So
> today's code stream is 20.x based. You should at least be on some 17.x, or
> better yet in many cases 18.x. You better be able to find a stable release
> in some version of these code streams.
On our MX480's, we are on 17.
On our MX204's, we are on 19.
We generally try to upgrade every 1.5 years.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
