I running 19.1R2.8 version on Junos. Today I was in contact with Juniper support about a route depletion problem and it seems to be related to the IRQs problem. When the IPv4 / IPv6 routes are exhausted in the LTM table, the IRQ increment begins. I did an analysis of the packages trafficked on the servers, but I found nothing out of the ordinary.
Em ter., 10 de nov. de 2020 às 17:47, Nitzan Tzelniker <[email protected]> escreveu: > > Looks ok to me > Which junos version you are running ? and which devices ? > Did you capture on the servers to see what is the traffic that causes the > high CPU utilization ? > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 9:07 PM Cristian Cardoso > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > show configuration protocols evpn >> vni-options { >> vni 810 { >> vrf-target target:888:888; >> } >> vni 815 { >> vrf-target target:888:888; >> } >> vni 821 { >> vrf-target target:888:888; >> } >> vni 822 { >> vrf-target target:888:888; >> } >> vni 827 { >> vrf-target target:888:888; >> } >> vni 830 { >> vrf-target target:888:888; >> } >> vni 832 { >> vrf-target target:888:888; >> } >> vni 910 { >> vrf-target target:666:666; >> } >> vni 915 { >> vrf-target target:666:666; >> } >> vni 921 { >> vrf-target target:666:666; >> } >> vni 922 { >> vrf-target target:666:666; >> } >> vni 927 { >> vrf-target target:666:666; >> } >> vni 930 { >> vrf-target target:666:666; >> } >> vni 932 { >> vrf-target target:666:666; >> } >> vni 4018 { >> vrf-target target:4018:4018; >> } >> } >> encapsulation vxlan; >> default-gateway no-gateway-community; >> extended-vni-list all; >> >> >> An example of configuring the interfaces follows, all follow this >> pattern with more or less IP's. >> > show configuration interfaces irb.810 >> proxy-macip-advertisement; >> virtual-gateway-accept-data; >> family inet { >> mtu 9000; >> address 10.19.11.253/22 { >> preferred; >> virtual-gateway-address 10.19.8.1; >> } >> } >> >> Em ter., 10 de nov. de 2020 às 15:16, Nitzan Tzelniker >> <[email protected]> escreveu: >> > >> > Can you show your irb and protocols evpn configuration please >> > >> > Nitzan >> > >> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 3:26 PM Cristian Cardoso >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Does anyone use EVPN-VXLAN in the Centrally-Routed and Bridging topology? >> >> I have two spine switches and two leaf switches, when I use the >> >> virtual-gateway in active / active mode in the spines, the servers >> >> connected only in leaf1 have a large increase in IRQ's, generating >> >> higher CPU consumption in the servers. >> >> I did a test by deactivating spine2 and leaving only the gateway >> >> spine1, and the IRQ was zeroed out. >> >> Did anyone happen to go through this? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
