FWIW, I deployed it for iBGP on MX gear in 20.4 with no concerns for an ASN I manage. No issues in our lab with a mix of 20.4, 21.2 and 22.4, all classic JunOS. I haven't tried it any other scenario.
-Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of Barry > Greene via juniper-nsp > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 7:50 PM > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [j-nsp] Q. Is anyone deploying TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO) on > their BGP peering Sessions? > > Hi Team, > > Q. Is anyone deploying TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO) on their BGP > peering Sessions? > > I’m not touching routers right now. I’m wondering if anyone has deployed, > your experiences, and thoughts? > > This is suppose to be the “replacement” for BGP MD5, ‘but’ I’m hearing ….. > > 1. The Vendors are not supporting yet. Which means a lot of older systems > would not be able to support a BGP session with TCP-AO. > 2. People have to tried is operationally. > > Sharing you thoughts would be helpful …... > > Thanks, > > Barry > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
