On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 21:23, Antti Ristimäki via juniper-nsp <[email protected]> wrote:
> Does anyone have any insight into this? This issue was discussed on > this list already over 10 years ago, for example: > https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2012-April/023134.html Personally I'm not convinced I'd even want this fixed, as it likely comes with significant per-packet cost. Reality is always some pragmatic version of standard. But I'm pretty sure if you press it, Juniper will accept it as PR. If I read the IPv6 standard correctly, nodes /have to/ join the ND multicast group, which they don't, which is good, because the whole thing is dumb, fragile and expensive. ICMPv6 ND forwarding is weird, most forward it happily in all cases, some like SROS punt all ICMPv6 ND with TTL 255, transit or punt, and transit all TTL 254 or less. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
