On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 20:35, heasley <[email protected]> wrote: > And enemy of security is lack of effort? Current BMCs would be > a step backward, imiho. I wish they were better; a lot of > potential..
What is the benchmark? Is benchmark NOS fate-sharing control-plane ethernet? Or RS232? How do they outperform arbitrarily insecure BMC? I wouldn't trust the BMC for security at any rate, the MGMT LAN would be as closed as SSH to RS232, with 0 expectation that on the RS232 side there is any security. I don't think security is important at all here. I want to be able to bring the box up quickly, when it dies, without sending people on the field. I care much more about availability of service, than security (and I don't think trade-off is being made here actually), because availability you can measure, security mostly you can't, it's astrology for men. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
