Andrey Kostin писал(а) 2024-07-23 16:27:
Andrey Kostin via juniper-nsp писал(а) 2024-07-09 10:10:
Correction, rib-group with policy is used to copy received prefixes to
inet6.0 on in-line route-reflectors.
For off-ramp RRs to place prefixes into inet6.3 it's enough to configure
this:
set protocols bgp group internal-v4 family inet6 labeled-unicast
explicit-null
set protocols bgp group internal-v4 family inet6 labeled-unicast rib
inet6.3
[...]
The problem here is that route-reflector selects a path with ipv4
mapped
nexthop and advertises it over ipv6 session. I'm wondering, is
anybody
already encountered this problem and found a solution how to make a
RR
to advertise paths with a correct nexthop?
For those who's interested, the working solution provided by JTAC is
to place routes received via inet6 labeled-unicast session into rib
inet6.3 using rib-group. This should be done at least on
route-reflectors. For on-ramp route-reflectors additional policy
assigning "no-advertise" community to routes copied into inet6.0 is
needed to not resend them to other RR_clients via inet6 unicast
session without explicit-null label.
Kind regards,
Andrey
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
