As a maintainer of quite of bit of Colab's iframing infrastructure: it does
a good job of isolating for security but it's not great at preventing the
`while (true) {}` case. The reason is that if the iframe is just a srcdoc
iframe then it shares the same thread, so a hang there will still hang your
entire page. If the iframe is using a separate origin then with Chrome's
OOPIF <https://www.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/oop-iframes>
feature it will wedge all iframes across all tabs, in even worse ways.
OOPIF's are still pretty new. Today, when dealing with while (true), the
non-iframed error model is superior.

I'm a strong believer in the value of the security model offered by
iframes, but they are non-trivial to implement.

try opening a notebook with 500 visible cells with output in Colab, and
> watch things die badly, due to trying to create 500 nontrivial iframes.

Yeah, there are a number of tricks... If the 500 cells were generated by
Colab then the resulting height of the output is also written to the
notebook file so a placeholder can be rendered instead. Then
IntersectionObserver is used to only render the output when it becomes
visible. This also helps minimize resize jank when loading a large
notebook. 500 cells is still... a whole lot of cells.

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 1:12 PM 'Aaron Watters' via Project Jupyter <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks Darian,
>
> I'm concerned that there is precisely one Javascript thread shared by all
> notebook interfaces in Jupyter Lab.
> I will try to come up with an example involving animation running in
> multiple notebooks that causes performance degradation.
>
> I agree that iframes are difficult to deal with. I think the additional
> robustness might be worth it.  Regarding your specific objections:
>
> 1) dropping "dead zone" -- this may be -- I don't know.  I'm personally
> probably willing to sacrifice this use case.  I never "drop" anything into
> a notebook myself.
> 2) iframes can't communicate with the rest of the application -- I think
> you could mediate communication between iframes if necessary on the server
> side.
>
> Thanks for the reply and comments!  -- Aaron Watters
>
> On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 3:19:31 PM UTC-4, Afshin T. Darian wrote:
>>
>> Hi Aaron,
>>
>> Thanks for writing. If you have a test case that you can contrive to
>> crash JupyterLab, we'd love to try to address the issue head on.
>>
>> But in the absence of that, here's what I surmise would happen if you did
>> run into a notebook that causes a runaway JS thread to cause JupyterLab to
>> become unresponsive:
>>
>> 1. Let's say you execute a cell and its result is that the web app
>> becomes unresponsive.
>> 2. Like many web apps, you would either refresh the tab or you would
>> close it and open a new one.
>> 3. When the new tab opens, it would restore the state of JupyterLab to
>> the last known saved state.
>> 4. Your broken notebook would be open and you could either close it or
>> modify the contents of the offending cell.
>>
>> I think you'd basically be in the same situation you were in the classic
>> notebook because of JupyterLab's layout/state restoration.
>>
>> As far as using iframes, they bring with them a lot of trouble, which
>> makes them unsuitable for an application like JupyterLab. They become a
>> "dead zone" in terms of drag and drop interoperability with the rest of
>> what is on your screen. Also, they don't have programmatic access to the
>> rest of the JupyterLab application and it makes interacting with other
>> extensions quite difficult.
>>
>> Thanks again for reaching out. If you do have a test notebook you'd like
>> us to look at, please reach out again or please file an issue
>> https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/issues/ so we can track it!
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> -Darian
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:17 PM Jason Grout <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for commenting on this! Do you want to open an issue on the
>>> JupyterLab repo about this where we can discuss more in detail the
>>> implications?
>>>
>>> For example, someone could write a notebook opener that would use
>>> iframes for isolation and would work alongside everything else in jlab.
>>> That might be a really interesting extension idea to explore.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 12:09 PM 'Aaron Watters' via Project Jupyter <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have reservations about Jupyter lab and I don't want to see "classic
>>>> notebooks" going away primarily for the following reason:
>>>>
>>>> My strongest attraction to Jupyter is that it provides a platform for
>>>> combining the Python interpreter with Javascript based tools
>>>> and visualizations.  For that reason I want to use and develop lots of
>>>> Javascript for use inside Jupyter.
>>>>
>>>> If in "classic" notebook the javascript interpreter falls in to an
>>>> infinite loop or has a memory leak or some other performance issue...
>>>> just close the browser tab.  Other notebooks are usually unaffected.
>>>> Nice!
>>>>
>>>> If in the Jupyter lab interface  the javascript interpreter falls in to
>>>> an infinite loop or has a memory leak or some other performance issue...
>>>> all the notebooks and other features in the Jupyter Lab interface stop
>>>> working.  Not nice.
>>>>
>>>> It might be possible to make the lab interface as robust as "classic"
>>>> if Jupyter lab embedded each notebook in an iframe with an independent web
>>>> context.
>>>> I'm unsure of the details of managing iframes or other implications.
>>>>
>>>> I think that this is the approach adopted by google colaboratory for
>>>> example https://colab.research.google.com/notebooks/welcome.ipynb
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to everyone for all the great work on Jupyter related projects
>>>> -- I just needed to get this comment off my chest.
>>>> Please comment or correct me.
>>>>
>>>>    -- Aaron Watters
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Project Jupyter" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jupyter/f625f4c4-1ea5-48a6-853c-89afd09ac2d6%40googlegroups.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jupyter/f625f4c4-1ea5-48a6-853c-89afd09ac2d6%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Project Jupyter" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jupyter/CAPDWZHz%3DQOh_E_RwuobM9Ye3zGNQ2QMi3UmYM1HD3PW_REKZfQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jupyter/CAPDWZHz%3DQOh_E_RwuobM9Ye3zGNQ2QMi3UmYM1HD3PW_REKZfQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Project Jupyter" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jupyter/39b73eb6-0b13-480b-b643-a53edd334118%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jupyter/39b73eb6-0b13-480b-b643-a53edd334118%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Project Jupyter" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jupyter/CACvpcBEddR47TCUJh1PjGZnTntvKLsbr8tX1KH2_d0%2BtYYXFjw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to