Per Bothner wrote: > Maybe after the JavaFX Script compiler stabilizes, and after > both have been moved to Mercurial, we can meet with the javac > compiler groups and discuss ideas for changes. It's hard to > generalize from one language, but with two languages we can > make a start. This is complicated by the legal requirement > that javac compiles Java and nothing but Java, so any modified > or extended features have to remain inaccessible when the > compiler is invoked as javac.
That would be most welcome. Having another dynamic language (say, Ruby?) represented in that discussion would be very helpful as well, since there are some unique complexities specific to dynamic languages compiling on the JVM. - Charlie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
