Matt Hellige wrote: > On Nov 1, 10:01 pm, Jon Harrop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Could a CAML derivative language for the JVM gain the same traction that F# is >>gaining on .NET? > > Perhaps if someone invested the same amount of money in it... (I guess > that's a bit cynical, but only a bit.)
It's not all that cynical. F# *was* ML for the JVM before the team (Persimmon IT) was bought by M$. http://www.dcs.ed.ac.uk/home/mlj/ Since MLj is GPL, it would be great if some smart folks would dust it off! Jim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
