> > Or are you saying you've got confidence in using LLVM on Mac OS X > > because Apple is using it too? > > No, I was saying that since it's included, it's a no-brainer to use > it. (Anyway, even if it's not included, it's not a problem as it's not > a big deal to download, compile, and link it in the thingie I'm > working on and ship it with it.) But you're right, I had the wrong > impression that it ships as an available-to-link-with framework with > 10.5. Just my wishful thinking :-) >
FWIW most of the LLVM developers work at Apple and most of the active development occurs on OSX as a platform. I haven't heard anything about an LLVM to JVM translator, but it may be possible. -eric --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
