On 2007.11.15., at 6:53, Ted Neward wrote:
> So, is it in a usable state? It is. That's a funny story actually. I uploaded to SourceForge a version numbered 0.2 on Tuesday. Then after I did it (but fortunately before I announced it anywhere), it dawned on me that I've been a bit, shall we say, cognitively dissonant. Namely, there was a bunch of functionality I added over the past few months that didn't have tests yet. Now, I really would be embarrassed if I released trivial bugs in the code (not to speak about turning people off with their first negative impressions), so I spent yesterday writing tests (and fixing bugs, of course). Having EMMA coverage measurement integrated into the test target of the build.xml helps immensely with this. Coverage is now 75% or 76%, which means that most of the functionality is now tested and works as I intended it to. (Of course I know that even 100% coverage wouldn't mean it's defect-free.) Since SourceForge download tracker showed there was one poor soul who downloaded 0.2, I couldn't just overwrite it, hence it's now 0.3. > Oh, yeah, and happy birthday! > > But seriously, is dynalang ready for exploration? I certainly believe it is now, otherwise I wouldn't have brought it out of the barn yet :-) Attila. > > ;-) > > Ted Neward > Java, .NET, XML Services > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > http://www.tedneward.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
