Yeah, the Scala code was a port of Java code that does similar things.  With
the Scala command line and some other Scala tools, it's much faster to make
a change and test the change with Scala than with Java.

On 11/30/07, David MacIver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> For what it's worth, the obvious Java translation does the same thing:
>
> class Foo{
>   public static void main(String[] args){
>     long bits = 0L;
>     long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
>     int  n = 2000000001;
>     while (n > 0) {
>       bits ^= (1 << 5);
>       n--;
>     }
>     System.out.println(bits);
>     long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
>     System.out.println(end-start);
>
>   }
> }
>
> So it isn't a quirk of the bytecode scala produces
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2007 11:18 PM, Erik Engbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > David,
> > For me 1.5 and 1.6 perform about the same...1.6 is a little faster.
> > However, -server yields the surprisingly fast results that you are
> seeing
> > under 1.6 and -client yields the slow results that you are seeing under
> 1.5.
> >
> > It still doesn't explain why it's so fast...but it's another data point.
> > I'm using an ancient computer with Linux.
> >
> > -Erik
> >
> >
> > On Nov 30, 2007 5:49 PM, David Pollak < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > I've got the following Scala code:
> > > object Foo {
> > >   def main(argv: Array[String]) {
> > >     var bits = 0L
> > >     val start = System.currentTimeMillis()
> > >     var n = 2000000001
> > >     // var n = 2000000001L // makes things very slow
> > >     while (n > 0) {
> > >       bits = bits ^ (1 << 5)
> > >       n = n - 1
> > >     }
> > >     System.out.println(bits)
> > >     val end = System.currentTimeMillis()
> > >     System.out.println(end-start)
> > >   }
> > > }
> > >
> > > I'm enclosing the source and the bytecode.
> > >
> > > There are 2B iterations.
> > >
> > > On my Core 2 Quad running JDK 1.6 (32 bit), the code takes 2 ms to
> run.
> > >
> > > On my Mac Book Pro (Core Duo, JDK 1.5) it takes 6,600 ms.
> > >
> > > The run time on the Mac seems more "reasonable".  What's going on?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > lift, the secure, simple, powerful web framework http://liftweb.net
> > > Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://erikengbrecht.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >  >
> >
>
> >
>


-- 
lift, the secure, simple, powerful web framework http://liftweb.net
Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM 
Languages" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to