On 2008.02.29., at 21:13, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> It does, but that's not really any better. We don't have char, we have > byte. The overhead of decoding our bytes to chars and back all the > time > was huge. So we needed a fast byte[]-based engine. This always intrigued me -- does this mean Ruby only works with single- byte character encodings? Or maybe even with just a single fixed character encoding? Attila. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
