Geert Bevin a écrit : > Hi John, > > I'm still reading through the spec but have an initial question. Will > the invokedynamic instruction only be able to mimic the invokevirtual > instruction, or will there be some kind of support for invokespecial > too? Remplacing an invokeSpecial by invokeDynamic (invokeDynamic on java.dyn.Dynamic) will lead to code that will be rejected by the bytecode verifier :( Thus there is no support for invokeSpecial. > I can see a great use-case here to hook in at object > instantiation time and perform some other logic instead of calling the > constructor. > A constructor must be called before a field access or a method call, see JVM spec 4.9.4. > Continuing the read ... > > Geert > cheers, Rémi > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 6:17 AM, John Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello, JVM language folks! >> >> The early draft review for the invokedynamic instruction is now >> available. You can find more information via my blog: >> http://blogs.sun.com/jrose/entry/invokedynamic_goes_public >> >> Best wishes, >> -- John >> >> > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
