Jochen Theodorou a écrit : > Rémi Forax schrieb: > [...] > >>> As you said the type of the target method handle embeds the receiver type, >>> and as john said the type of the site doesn't include the receiver type. >>> >>> I don't like that mismatch, because it's confusing >>> >> I know now why the receiver type is not available. >> because invokedynamic is an invokeinterface with java/dyn/Dynamic as >> receiver, >> the receiver is lost. So in my opinion callsite.type().parameters(0) >> should be always java/lang/Object. >> > > if this is true... shouldn't then it be removed? I mean why having a > value here if the value is always and ever the same. > Because you have to check the method handle signature when setTarget() is called. The easy way to do that is to check that target.type() is equals (using ==) to classSite.type().
> bye Jochen > > Rémi --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
