In my opinion, having one exit point is important only inside a try/finally block in order to avoid to duplicate the inlined finally block at all exit sites.
Rémi John Rose a écrit : > As far as HotSpot is concerned, it doesn't matter. C2 makes up the > same SSA graph (except for deopt info.) for both cases. > > This indifference is almost certainly true for any JVM, since each > JVM has to accept the output of any bytecode generator. > > -- John > > On Oct 13, 2008, at 2:26 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: > > >> I was examining the bytecode output of Duby this morning, comparing it >> to javac output, and noticed that for fib() there's only one small >> difference: javac inserts an extra branch in order to have a single >> return instruction. >> >> Is this useful? Necessary? Anyone know why javac does this, since it >> increases the bytecode size for this simple case? >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
