>>>> I'm working under the assumption that it is possible to "pre- >>>> compile" Groovy into bytecode. >>>> If so, then the Groovy runtime theoretically shouldn't need to >>>> perform class generation, >>>> wouldn't need security privileges, and thus wouldn't require a >>>> signed applet. Is this accurate? > > Missed that part, sorry. > > Even if we pre-compile Groovy, I think we're still doing some runtime > bytecode generation, and that's something that's not allowed if you're > not signing your jar, as far as I recall the details.
OK - thanks for the confirmation. Greg --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
