Rodrigo B. de Oliveira wrote: >> It meets several goals I've had for Duby, which would mean I >> might not have to implement them :) > > Nice :)
Boo also has (as I understand it) a very pluggable toolchain. My thought has been that I could use Duby syntax but instead build a Boo AST and then let it take over from there. What sort of runtime dependencies does Boo have? Is that what you're working on porting, mostly? - Charlie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
