John Rose schrieb: > b61 has the same JVM bits as b59, the JavaOne preview release, which > has a number of implementation limits; this is probably one of them.
the example is from http://weblogs.java.net/blog/forax/archive/2009/06/asm_now_support_1.html which I thought is working... ah well... the NYI I see in the log sounds very much like a "not yet implemented" ;) > The example (not sure which you're trying) probably works in the mlvm > version. Here is a set of demos that are known to work: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/file/tip/netbeans/indy-demo/src/ known to work with mlvm or with openjdk7 b61? Because with b61 it seems to not to work. There are several compilation errors I could fix, but still I got the very same error. There is still no mlvm build I can try... or even better, build myself. > The currently passing unit tests are in: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/file/tip/netbeans/meth/test > > (See esp. meth/test/jdk/java/dyn/MethodHandlesTest.java.) > > In general, as a "mere" matter of engineering process, a JVM built > from the mlvm patches will be a few weeks ahead of the JDK7 code. well, the current b61 seems to be too basic to try anything. bye Jochen -- Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou The Groovy Project Tech Lead (http://groovy.codehaus.org) http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jvm-languages+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
