On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Jochen Theodorou <[email protected]> wrote: >> use is quite complex and the design is not best in all parts. So maybe >> there is a better AST out there. At last with the Groovy AST I know how >> to do things ;) > > I'm not even sure a common AST is required. Maybe I'm not making > myself clear enough?
I think that we should ensure that a common AST is *not* required. As you say, > The lingua franca for languages compiling together is a common set of > types they can use to collaborate through. and that's all we need. Cheers, Miles -- Miles Sabin tel: +44 (0)7813 944 528 skype: milessabin http://www.chuusai.com/ http://twitter.com/milessabin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
