On 02/17/2011 03:35 PM, Alessio Stalla wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Steven Shaw<[email protected]> wrote:
On 7 February 2011 11:37, Robert Fischer<[email protected]> wrote:
How so?
your "scripting" client can communicate with a fork()ing server. Different
clones of the server could exist which have preloaded certain jars of
interest for jruby, groovy, scala etc.
I would prefer to have a save-image feature rather than fork() for
that. You could launch very quickly a JVM with all your jars
preloaded, with no client-server communication involved.
The save-image feature already exists to reduce the startup time of the jdk,
it will be easier to implement it when we will have modules.
Rémi
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM
Languages" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
