> > > As a rule of thumb I suppose I'd say you want to inline methods that > have the best cost/size ratio; basically, inline the smallest, hottest > methods first. I'd love to hear from the JVM vendors what rules their > compilers follow, though (and whether there are papers the rest of us > could read to understand them better).
Indeed... I was looking for better tooling to let me look at the code cache and talked to Cliff Click about this a couple of weeks ago. His comment was that he was surprised that people were interested in this subject along with how the code cache was managed. The code cache was intended to be self managing thus no need to metrics. If anyone can point to better doc/tooling in this area..... Kirk -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
