On 13 April 2011 17:21, Rémi Forax <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/13/2011 06:12 PM, Kevin Wright wrote: > > No... He really didn't, Ceylon is nothing like Scala. > > > come on ! > singleton object, case classes, declaration site variance, named & default > argument, > null safety (?, Option), DSL ready syntax ... > all of these already exists in Scala. > > The only things which is new is the syntax for annotation (without @). > > Collection literals baked into the language and not in the library, no null support for Java interop, no full unification of objects/functions, no implicits, no infix call notation, special handling for operators, no pattern matching, no higher-kinded typing.
Almost every design pattern that I'm coming to think of as idiomatic Scala is not possible in Ceylon. > Did you not see the other thread we already have going about this? > > > no ? > > Rémi > > > > > On 13 April 2011 17:05, Rémi Forax <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The title reflect my opinion. >> Anyway, it can interest some of you. >> >> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Ceylon >> >> Rémi >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "JVM Languages" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en. >> >> > > > -- > Kevin Wright > > gtalk / msn : [email protected] > mail: [email protected] > vibe / skype: kev.lee.wright > quora: http://www.quora.com/Kevin-Wright > twitter: @thecoda > > "My point today is that, if we wish to count lines of code, we should not > regard them as "lines produced" but as "lines spent": the current > conventional wisdom is so foolish as to book that count on the wrong side of > the ledger" ~ Dijkstra > > > -- Kevin Wright gtalk / msn : [email protected] <[email protected]>mail: [email protected] vibe / skype: kev.lee.wright quora: http://www.quora.com/Kevin-Wright twitter: @thecoda "My point today is that, if we wish to count lines of code, we should not regard them as "lines produced" but as "lines spent": the current conventional wisdom is so foolish as to book that count on the wrong side of the ledger" ~ Dijkstra -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
