On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, that's what it means. If the stubs were generated ahead of time, > then you're right: it's no better than a class-per-function. However > in JRuby we generate the stubs at runtime, so you can batch-compile a > bunch of Ruby code to .class and only the stubs actually used will be > generated and live only in-memory. Ah, okay. My effort is strictly AOT (dynamically typed, but otherwise fairly "static" language), so there's no effective difference. But per-class is simpler, and I'll probably go with that. -- GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
