Rémi Forax wrote:
> A combination of LINQ expression tree + CLR seems easier to use but I

For me, using LINQ expression trees wouldn't offer an advantage over directly 
emitting IL.

> don't know .Net enough to be sure that MutableCallSite#syncAll can
> be implemented.

Yeah, that's going to be a tough one to do better than the trivial 
implementation. OTOH, I have no illusion that IKVM.NET's JSR 292 implementation 
is going to be anywhere near competitive with HotSpot, so I'm not too worried. 
My main worry is getting everything working. However, I'm positive that JSR 292 
will improve dynamic language performance on top of IKVM.NET, because it is 
much easier for me to optimize than the current reflection (and dynamic code 
gen) code paths.

Regards,
Jeroen

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM 
Languages" group.
To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
jvm-languages+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.

Reply via email to