-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I think NetRexx is about the same age - June '96 AFAIR (I would have to look it 
up, maybe it's
even older...). Currently on version 3.01RC and active. But it compiles to Java 
source code, not
directly to bytecode; but it can hide that fact quite well as the 'normal' user 
just invokes nrc
and it does the java compile on its own. You *can* split that process for 
javadoc et al, though.

cu, Patric

Per Bothner schrieb am 20.08.2012 01:14:
> I have a couple of claims I like to make, but to keep me honest I'd like to 
> know if I'm wrong
> about:
> 
> - Kawa is the oldest currently-active functional language on the JVM. (Kawa 
> dates back to
> 1996.)
> 
> - Kawa is the oldest currently-active "scripting language" on the JVM. (For 
> some definition of
> "scripting language"!)
> 
> - Kawa is the language (active or not) with the oldest compiler for the JVM, 
> not counting Java
> or Java dialects.  By "compiler" I primarily compilation directly to JVM 
> bytescodes (.class
> files or ClassLoader.defineClass), though I'm also curious about languages 
> that compiled to
> Java source code. (Kawa compiled to JVM bytecodes in 1996.)
> 
> Anyone know of counter-examples?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: GnuPT 2.5.2

iEYEARECAAYFAlAxdv8ACgkQfGgGu8y7ypBtRgCePHz2ZxAzwpD7UgDF4o8+Oghb
DosAn3RbnAyLy9FZ4Mr1pICLoDzmxjzt
=LPZS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM 
Languages" group.
To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
jvm-languages+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.

Reply via email to