I'm thinking of changing Kawa's name mangling (at least for class names), and it would be helpful to have some information before doing so:
(1) I'd like a feel for home common/popular is the mangling described by John Rose: https://blogs.oracle.com/jrose/entry/symbolic_freedom_in_the_vm (2) What tools, if any, such as IDEs, support this mangling? (3) Any problems or suggested modifications to John's proposal? Historically, I've used a mangling that translates into valid Java identifiers, in the interest of Java interoperability: It is a feature if Java can reference Scheme compiled classes and members without reflection. However, are some downsides, most obviously that it makes for ugly and surprising class and member names. For package names it could means that the compiled class is in a different directory than the source file. More generally, it is desirable that source class names (modules names in Kawa) matches compiled class names. Finally, Java reserved word cause a problem: Should we mangle the identifier 'package' just because it is a reserved word in Java? So I'm planning to "mangle less" when it comes to at least package and class names. And if I'm going to change it, it may be reasonable to change it to John's proposal, at least if other people are using it, as is my understanding. (I'm not changing procedure -> method name mangling and possible not variable ->field mangling, because that affects the programming experience. For example Kawa will compile a procedure name lookup-file-name to a method name lookupFileName, and a property access path-name may get compiled to a method getPathName. Those are useful features for Java interoperability.) -- --Per Bothner p...@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jvm-languages+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.