Feature Requests item #984688, was opened at 2004-07-03 20:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by henryju You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=497985&aid=984688&group_id=61302
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: Release 1.3 >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martijn Dashorst (dashorst) Assigned to: Martijn Dashorst (dashorst) Summary: Use jetty as testserver Initial Comment: Currently, PseudoServer is used as testserver for testing jWebUnit against. This testserver is rather limited in functionality (for instance, it doesn't support cookies). Using a real server as testserver will enable us to test jWebUnit even better. The current testcases are sometimes rather complex or not very intuitive. Using direct HTML pages as testcases will enable us to drive the tests. The proposal is to use Jetty as 'the testserver' of choice. It is simple to set up and probably supports all types of testcases we could imagine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Julien HENRY (henryju) Date: 2006-06-05 16:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1235926 Done with Jetty 6.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nicholas Neuberger (nneuberger) Date: 2004-07-14 18:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=175635 Do we still need to refactor all of the test cases? Ie. search of references on JWebUnitTest.defineResource These references directly delegate to the pseudoserver.HttpUserAgentTest I'm guessing, all of the hard-coded web pages should be moved to actual *.html pages to be used by jetty. Then I can finish the jacobie integration..... Its almost there. Thoughts.... See Ya, Nick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Dashorst (dashorst) Date: 2004-07-13 01:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=695103 Jetty is enabled, the helloworld test works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Dashorst (dashorst) Date: 2004-07-07 21:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=695103 I probably won't be able to put lots of effort into it. My girlfriend is planning the evenings and weekend full as I'm typing this message :-) I suppose I can get some time on the evenings early next week (monday/tuesday/wednesday evening). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nicholas Neuberger (nneuberger) Date: 2004-07-07 04:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=175635 I was hoping to use it in the next 3 - 14 days. I can start building the Jacobie integration with it. Right now, without the test server changes, it will be very hard to build the jacobie integration. The testserver change looks like its minimal. I was thinking instead of the "sample" package that it would directly integrate / replace the psuedoserver code. Plus, also using the JettyDecorator pattern for all of the test cases and the test suites. Can you make the changes within the next week or two? If not, I can pull down the main trunk head and make the mods. See Ya, Nick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Dashorst (dashorst) Date: 2004-07-07 00:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=695103 I was wondering how much of the integration you already had in place. You mentioned doing stuff a little different from the example. I am willing to implement Jetty as testserver. How soon do you need it? :-P ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nicholas Neuberger (nneuberger) Date: 2004-07-06 23:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=175635 Martijn, are you going to add this to the main HEAD trunk? if not, let me know. I can make the changes in the jacobie branch. then merge later into HEAD. I would like to start using it for the JACOBIE integration. Any thoughts. See Ya, Nick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=497985&aid=984688&group_id=61302 _______________________________________________ Jwebunit-development mailing list Jwebunit-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jwebunit-development
