Feature Requests item #1519807, was opened at 2006-07-10 08:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=497985&aid=1519807&group_id=61302
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core API Group: Release 2.1 >Status: Closed Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Fred (fburlet) Assigned to: Jevon Wright (jevonwright) Summary: Add assertLabeled* methods Initial Comment: When I was writing tests I noticed that it could be usefull to add the following methods to complete the set of basic ones: assertLabeledTextFieldPresent(String textFieldId, String textFieldName, String labelContent) assertLabeledCheckBoxPresent(String checkBoxId, String checkBoxName, String labelContent) assertLabeledSelectBoxPresent(String selectId, String selectName, String labelContent) assertLabeledTextAreaPresent(String textAreaId, String textAreaName, String labelContent) assertLabeledRadioButtonPresent(String radioId, String radioGroup, String radioOption, String labelContent) assertHiddenFieldPresent(String hiddenName) These will validate that we have a label with a for attribute which refers to a text field with the given id. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot) Date: 2008-11-12 02:20 Message: This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by the administrator of this Tracker). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jevon Wright (jevonwright) Date: 2008-10-29 02:10 Message: I have added assertLabeledFieldEquals(id, text) and assertLabel*() methods method to r756, allowing you to test a field that is connected to a particular label. Is this enough methods? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fred (fburlet) Date: 2006-07-12 07:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1552814 Maybe it will be better to include the formNameOrId as argument for each of the proposed methods. This will validate that a given form contains a given element. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=497985&aid=1519807&group_id=61302 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ JWebUnit-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jwebunit-development
