On 28 October 2014 10:42:40 pm AEDT, Jean-Luc GARNIER <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi all, > >I've read some feedbacks that condescendingly suggest my request is >just a lazy way to have things done by others, but (sorry Greg) I don't >have the talent to place my own updates into the source code... This is >why I kindly ask the dev team to add my (and I'm not alone in this >case) request on their todo list... > >I don't understand why you disregard my request, as all I'd like to get >is an option to use either ASCII or HTML signature (on an account basis >for instance). This would satisfy both ASCIIists and ugly black ducks >like me who would prefer HTML signatures. Why do you raise a wall >between both categories? I must confess that I sometimes use ASCII >signature and text (I'm 50, so I started my computing life with BBS and >Usenet), but most of my professional mails are now HTML... > >Cordialement / Best regards, > >Jean-Luc GARNIER
fwiw, I don't mind at all if html sigs are added, but, assuming development resources are limited? I'd rather developers develop useful code, rather than eye candy... -- Sent from Kaiten Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the K-9 Mail Users List. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, email [email protected] To report an issue with K-9 Mail, visit http://code.google.com/p/k9mail/issues/list For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/k-9-mail --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "K-9 Mail" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
