Oleg:
> Follow the link below:
> http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/16728/0/7371519/ .
> Here, in section "III. LONG-TERM PLANS", we suggest option A or B of
> Kaboodle further development. A: without adopting SSH, B: with SSH. We need
> to hear about your choice as upon this depends our January schedule. We
> believe option A is quite reasonable as in 2.5 -3 months (your new key
> scheme is not accounted) we'll have a workable product.
As per yesterday's email, the SSH protocol you speak about
is actually three pieces. So, in my understanding, option-A completes
the equivalent of the connection-layer of the SSH protocol into
Kaboodle without implementing the transport-layer of SSH.
If that's correct, then let's pursue option-A, independently
of the transport-layer. It's important that some time in the future
we can change *just the transport-layer* to be more like SSH without
having to throw out any of the work we do now.
Agreed?
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Kaboodle-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaboodle-devel
