I'm all for doing that. There's a lot of stuff I've found that I'd like to plunk into the tree, but I'd like to do some re-organizing first. So it's a post-1.0.7 item. I'd rather have a clean way of incorporating stuff that's actively being maintained elsewhere, since I'd rather not have the responsibility of maintaining code that's been "forked" off of somebody else's tree - instead I want a way of being able to easily update the code from the "upstream" sources.
Cheers, - Jim On Sun, 2002-05-12 at 12:31, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > I'm sorry if I am beating a dead horse here, but what about porting the > code into Kaffe's tree? Presumably GPL + exception -> pure GPL presents > no licensing problems. > > I'm not very interested in Swing but more interested in java.nio, which > classpath have also implemented now. I was even considering taking a > crack at writing a java.nio for Kaffe before, but with classpath already > having done it, I find that hard to motivate. > > On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 08:14:27AM -0700, Jim Pick wrote: > > On Sun, 2002-05-12 at 03:34, James Walker wrote: > > > Is there anything in the works to include Java swing packages with the next >version of Kaffe? > > > > We can't, since they are owned by Sun. > > > > I did notice, however, that the Classpath guys have reimplemented a few > > of the swing classes themselves. I want to get Classpath working with > > Kaffe in a future release. > > > > Cheers, > > > > - Jim > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > kaffe mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe > > -- > > Oskar Sandberg > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ > kaffe mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
