On Thu, 30 May 2002, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:41:52AM -0700, Dalibor Topic wrote: > > What do you think? > If you want performances, use an XSLT processor written in C > /me hides ...
Now if we just could use the gcj compiled Xalan/Xerces from rhug project with Kaffe, wouldn't even have to be written in C in the first place :) (Except for size, ofcourse). Even so, it's worthwhile to use it as a test for optimizing Kaffe for those sections that are written in pure Java for reason or another. And yes, I know you were most likely joking, but native compilation of some base packages is one thing we're looking at to offset the common embedded disadvantage in speed. -Jukka Santala _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
