--- Benja Fallenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > current behavior, I'm fine with that; I'm just > wondering whether Kaffe > wants to aim for consistency, in which case I could > try patching Kaffe > instead of changing Gzz. > > Any opinions? >
Here's the way I see it in general terms: If the behaviour is mandated by the 1.4 API spec, we should behave as the spec says. If it is not, and there is an inconsistency between kaffe and sun, we should try to match Sun unless there is a good, documented reason why we don't do so. In the case above, I think patching kaffe would be better than working around bugs. You should also take a look at the pocketlinux sources for the AWT classes you are going to patch, as they might already contain fixes for such problems. best regards, dalibor topic __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
