> It works if I double the stack size, -ss 64K. shit :)
> That would only buy us cases where the serialization > stack fits into 64K. In order to be able to serialize > more complicated objects, we'd have to bump up the > stack size again. So I'm wondering if serialization > could be made non-recursive using a List to store the > entries in the order to be serialized, and then > iterating over the list and writing them out on the > stream. That should in theory handle as large objects > as can fit into memory. What do you think? Sounds marvelous to me. > best regards, > dalibor topic tim _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
